Uploads, clips, and takedowns

User Content and DMCA

Players keep ownership of what they create, but by submitting it they grant enough permission for Prozilli to host, display, format, moderate, archive, and promote it in connection with the ecosystem. Copyright complaints should use a real takedown process.

Read the page Back to legal hub
🎥
Players keep ownershipSubmitting content does not hand over full ownership, but it does grant the permissions needed to host and use it inside the ecosystem.
limited license
🧹
Content can be moderatedUploads can be removed, edited for presentation, or archived when policy, safety, or operations require it.
reviewable
📮
DMCA has a processClaims and counter-claims should go through a documented route instead of public accusations.
formal
Players keep ownership limited licenseContent can be moderated reviewableDMCA has a process formalPlayers keep ownership limited licenseContent can be moderated reviewableDMCA has a process formal
🖼️ What counts as user content

Applications, screenshots, clips, comments, business listings, uploads, support attachments, and similar submissions can all create content records.

Content license

By submitting content, you grant enough permission for Prozilli to host, display, reproduce, format, moderate, archive, and promote that content in connection with the ecosystem.

  • The license supports operation and promotion.
  • Formatting changes do not change your underlying ownership.
  • Moderation and archival rights still apply.

Moderation and removal

Content can be hidden, edited for presentation, or removed where community standards, legal issues, safety, or product integrity require it.

  • Policy violations may lead to removal.
  • Safety concerns can justify urgent action.
  • Archived content may still be retained for review or legal reasons.
📜 How copyright claims work

A copyright complaint should use a documented takedown path, not public callout culture.

What a takedown notice should include

A valid claim should identify the work, the allegedly infringing material, the claimant’s authority, and enough contact information for response.

  • Clear description of the copyrighted work.
  • Clear location of the reported content.
  • Good-faith and authority statements where required.

Counter-notices and repeat abuse

If a claim is disputed, a counter-notice path may exist. Repeat or obviously bad-faith abuse of copyright reporting can still trigger platform action.

  • False claims can carry consequences.
  • Counter-notice requires a real process.
  • Repeat infringer handling may apply where needed.
References

This page follows the source references captured in the Prozilli Website Legal Manual and updates as the operating systems behind the city grow.

R7R8